The Insurance Trap

A note before we begin: This article is written to raise awareness – not to provide legal, insurance, or compliance advice. Every organization’s situation is different. Before filling out or renewing a cyber insurance application, talk to a licensed insurance professional who understands your specific environment. What follows is meant to help you ask better questions, not answer them for you.

There is a moment I have seen play out more than once in this industry that I want to help you never experience.

A business gets hit. Something goes wrong – ransomware, a data breach, a wire transfer that went somewhere it should not have. The owner files a claim against the cyber insurance policy they have been paying for, sometimes for years. And the claim comes back denied.

What happens next is almost always the same. The blame starts moving. It goes to the IT provider, to the employee who clicked the link, to the insurance broker, to the vendor, to anyone within reach.

But the application had one signature on it. And that signature was the owner’s.

The Application Problem

Cyber insurance applications are detailed documents. They ask specific technical questions about your security environment – and those questions are not casual. Your answers to them form the basis of the policy. If your actual security posture does not match what you represented on the application, the insurer has grounds to deny the claim.

The problem is not that business owners lie on these applications. In almost every case I have seen, they do not. The problem is that they answer questions they do not fully understand – and the gap between what they meant and what the question was actually asking becomes the reason the claim does not pay.

Two examples I see repeatedly:

“Do you have antivirus or EDR on all endpoints?”

The owner thinks about this for a moment and answers yes. Windows Defender is on. Every machine has it. That is antivirus, right?

It is. But the question is asking whether the organization has active, managed endpoint protection – ideally an Endpoint Detection and Response solution that monitors behavior in real time, generates alerts, and is being actively reviewed by someone. Windows Defender running quietly in the background on an unmanaged device is not the same thing. The answer the owner gave was honest. It was also wrong in the way that matters.

“Are your servers where customer data is stored secured and backed up?”

The owner picks up the phone and calls their third-party software vendor. The vendor confirms they are SOC 2 compliant. Their servers are secured and backed up. The owner marks yes and moves on.

But the question was not asking about the vendor’s servers. It was asking about your servers – the ones on site. The Active Directory server. The domain controller. The file server. The NAS drive sitting in the back office. The places where your operational data actually lives on your network.

The vendor’s SOC 2 certification is real and it matters. It just does not answer the question that was asked.

The Accountability You Cannot Delegate

Here is where this gets serious in a way most business owners have never been shown.

Under the FTC Safeguards Rule, organizations cannot simply appoint a Qualified Individual to run their security program and consider the legal responsibility transferred. The FTC holds the organization and its leadership – the owners, the board – accountable for the security posture of the business. You can hire experts. You can bring in a vCISO. You can work with an MSP. But the accountability for what was represented on that insurance application does not leave the room with them when they go home.

The signature on the application is the owner’s. The responsibility for what it says is the owner’s.

This is not meant to frighten anyone away from cyber insurance – quite the opposite. Cyber insurance is an important part of a mature security posture. The point is that the application deserves the same seriousness as the policy itself.

What Honest Looks Like

Filling out a cyber insurance application honestly does not mean you need to be a security expert. It means you need to know what you actually have – and be willing to say “I don’t know” or “we don’t have that” when that is the truth.

An incomplete or uncertain answer that leads to a conversation with your broker is infinitely better than a confident answer that creates a gap your insurer finds after the incident.

Some questions worth asking before you sign: – Do I actually understand what each question is asking, or am I interpreting it in the way that sounds best? – When this application asks about backups, is it asking about my vendor’s environment or mine? – When it asks about endpoint protection, does what I have actually meet that standard? – Has anyone who understands my specific environment reviewed these answers? – Does my actual security posture today match what this application says it does?

If any of those questions give you pause, that pause is information. Talk to your insurance broker. Talk to a security professional who has seen your environment. Get the answers right before you need them to hold up under scrutiny.

The Claim That Does Not Pay

The hardest version of this conversation happens after something goes wrong.

By then, the application has already been filed. The policy is already in place. And when the claim comes in, the insurer reviews what was represented against what was actually true – and if those two things do not match, the claim can be denied in part or in full.

At that point, the organization is facing the full cost of the incident without the safety net they thought they had. And the blame moves fast – to the IT provider, to the employee, to the broker, to anyone who touched the process.

But the application had one signature. And everything that follows from a denied claim flows back to that signature.

The Right Way to Think About This

Cyber insurance is not a substitute for security. It is a financial backstop for when security is not enough. And like any backstop, it only works if it was built correctly.

The organizations that get the most out of their cyber insurance are the ones that treated the application as seriously as the policy – that worked with professionals who understood their environment, answered every question accurately, and built a security posture that matched what they represented.

That is not a complicated standard. It is just an honest one.

And honesty, in this context, is the difference between a policy that pays and one that does not.

—

This article is intended to raise general awareness about cyber insurance representations and is not legal, insurance, or compliance advice. Please consult a licensed insurance professional and a qualified cybersecurity advisor who can evaluate your specific environment before completing or renewing any insurance application.

Kelly Hansen is the author of The IT Dilemma: Why Good Businesses Fail During Cyberattacks, Outages, and Technology Disasters – and How to Prevent It. Have a question about your own environment? Reach out: Contact, or connect with me on LinkedIn.

Related reading: What Is a vCISO